Comparasion of International and Indonesian Green Building Standards: Opportunities for Regulatory Harmonisation

Authors

  • Stephanus Wirawan Dharmatanna Petra Christian University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-7903
  • Wido Hintono Petra Christian University
  • Cherielyn Wijaya Petra Christian University
  • Adeline Adeline Petra Christian University
  • Stefanus Christian Petra Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52166/dearsip.v6i01.11175

Keywords:

Green building, Rating systems, Regulatory harmonization, Indonesia, NDC 2030, G20

Abstract

The building sector accounts for nearly 40% of global energy-related emissions, positioning it as a critical area for climate change mitigation and sustainable development. In line with the Paris Agreement, Indonesia has committed to reducing emissions by 29% unconditionally and up to 41% with international support by 2030. Compared to other G20 members, however, Indonesia’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) remains modest, with the building sector underrepresented in its roadmap. Strengthening green building regulation is therefore essential to closing this gap. This study conducts a comparative analysis of three international rating systems—LEED (United States), Green Mark (Singapore), and Green Star (Australia)—and two Indonesian frameworks: the Greenship Rating System and Banyuwangi Regency Regulation No. 1 of 2022. Using a qualitative documentary approach, the research evaluates these frameworks across three dimensions: core criteria, assessment mechanisms, and contextual adaptation. Secondary data were drawn from official certification guidelines, regulatory documents, and published case studies, including Banyuwangi International Airport, which achieved Greenship Gold Certification under the municipal regulation. The findings indicate that while international systems emphasize comprehensiveness, innovation, and performance verification, Indonesian frameworks prioritize tropical adaptation and regulatory compliance. The Banyuwangi case demonstrates the potential of local governments to institutionalize sustainability but also highlights the limitations of narrow regulatory scope. The study identifies four strategies for harmonization: integrating LEED’s verification mechanisms, Green Mark’s tropical efficiency benchmarks, Green Star’s social dimensions, and scaling progressive local initiatives nationally. By adopting these strategies, Indonesia can enhance the global credibility of its green building frameworks, strengthen the building sector’s contribution to its NDC 2030 targets, and reduce the gap with other G20 countries, thereby advancing both national and global climate goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprilian, B. K., & Rizaldi, M. A. (2023). Achieving Green Airport Standards by Managing Indoor CO and CO2 Levels at Domestic Terminal of Banyuwangi Airport. Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development.

Aram, K., Taherkhani, R., & Šimelytė, A. (2022). Multistage Optimization toward a Nearly Net Zero Energy Building Due to Climate Change. Energies, 15(3), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030983

Almeida, L., Senaratne, S., & Perera, S. (2025). Implementing Sustainable Strategies Towards Green Star Classification: Collaborative Project of an Educational Building. In Embedding Sustainability in Built Environment Curricula: Opportunities and Challenges (pp. 67-83). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Cahyaningrum, S. D., & Yudianto, K. (2023). Pengaruh penerapan konsep green building terhadap kenyamanan pengguna jasa di terminal Bandar Udara Internasional Banyuwangi. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 1(2), 112-120.

den Elzen, M. G. J., Dafnomilis, I., Forsell, N., Fragkos, P., Fragkiadakis, K., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Nascimento, L., Roelfsema, M., van Soest, H., & Sperling, F. (2022). Updated nationally determined contributions collectively raise ambition levels but need strengthening further to keep Paris goals within reach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 27(5), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-022-10008-7

Dharmatanna, S. W., Nathanael, N., Gunawan, S., & Florencia, N. (2026). Dinamika Geografis, Iklim, dan Budaya dalam Standar Bangunan Hijau: Studi Komparatif Global. Jurnal Sains Bangunan, 3(1), 28-37.

Dharmatanna, S. W. (2023). ARCHITECTONIC REGIONALISME DALAM ARSITEKTUR OSING. ALUR : Jurnal Arsitektur, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.54367/alur.v6i2.2605

Dharmatanna, S. W., & Hidayatun, M. I. (2021). KAJIAN PENDEKATAN TACTILE REGIONALISME DALAM ARSITEKTUR OSING. Advances in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Architecture, 3(1), Article 1.

Doan, D. T., Tran, H. V., Aigwi, I. E., Naismith, N., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Ghaffarianhoseini, A. (2023). Green building rating systems: A critical comparison between LOTUS, LEED, and Green Mark. Environmental Research Communications, 5(7), 075008. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ace613

Hastuti, I. S. (2024). Assessing Indonesia’s Enhanced Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) to The Paris Agreement: Identifying The Obstacles Indonesia has in Addressing Climate Change. 154–167. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-269-9_14

Ilmi, A. M., & Sunarya, W. (2024). Analysis of the Principles of Green Architecture in Bogor Creative Hub. DEARSIP: Journal of Architecture and Civil, 4(02), 12-25.

Jaumotte, M. F., Liu, W., & McKibbin, W. J. (2021). Mitigating Climate Change: Growth-Friendly Policies to Achieve Net Zero Emissions by 2050. International Monetary Fund.

Kimura, S., & Meng, L. S. (2021). Technical Guidelines for Energy Efficiency and Conservation in Commercial Buildings. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:era:eriabk:2021-rpr-14

Le, A., Rodrigo, N., Domingo, N., & Senaratne, S. (2023). Policy Mapping for Net-Zero-Carbon Buildings: Insights from Leading Countries. Buildings, 13(11), 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112766

Lendra, L., Jesica, J., Wibowo, M. A., Hatmoko, J. U. D., & Andi, A. (2025). Green building assessment tools in Indonesia: A systematic literature review and comparative analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 605, 03023. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560503023

Liu, Z., Wang, Q., Gan, V. J., & Peh, L. (2020). Envelope thermal performance analysis based on building information model (BIM) cloud platform—Proposed green mark collaboration environment. Energies, 13(3), 586.

Meidayanti Mustika, N. W., Sueca, N. P., Acwin Dwijendra, N. K., & Agung Diasana Putra, I. D. G. (2021). Sustainable Socio-cultural Aspect Within Green Building User Behavior in Bali, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 933(1), 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/933/1/012021

Nain, A., Banerjee, A., & Melkania, N. p. (2021). Effects of Green Buildings on the Environment. In Digital Cities Roadmap (pp. 477–507). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119792079.ch15

Rossa, A., Firmansyah, M. A., & Zuhri, S. (2023). THE EFFECT OF BANYUWANGI AIRPORT FACADE DESIGN ON THERMAL COMFORT. ADBE, 3(1), 113-123.

Sahid, Sumiyati, Y., & Purisari, R. (2020). The Constrains of Green Building Implementation in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1485(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1485/1/012050

Saleh, N. M., Saleh, A. M., Raed A. Hasan, Keighobadi, J., Ahmed, O. K., & Hamad, Z. K. (2024). Analyzing and Comparing Global Sustainability Standards: LEED, BREEAM, and PBRS in Green Building arch article topic. Babylonian Journal of Internet of Things, 2024, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.58496/BJIoT/2024/009

Sentot Sudarwanto, A. & Daryanti. (2025). Examining legal tools in encouraging the achievement of net zero emission: A way forward for Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1438(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1438/1/012018

Song, K., Farr, K. B., & Hsu, A. (2024). Assessing subnational climate action in G20 cities and regions: Progress and ambition. One Earth, 7(12), 2189–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.10.001

Sukma, M. F. A., & Cahyono, H. S. (2025). ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS IN KAMAJAYA HOUSING IN SUPPORTING THE FEASIBILITY OF LIVING. DEARSIP: Journal of Architecture and Civil, 5(02), 257-274.

Tsirovasilis, E., Katafygiotou, M., & Psathiti, C. (2025). Comparative Assessment of LEED, BREEAM, and WELL: Advancing Sustainable Built Environments. Energies, 18(16), 4322. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164322

Udawatta, N., Zuo, J., Chiveralls, K., & Zillante, G. (2020). From green buildings to living buildings? Rating schemes and waste management practices in Australian educational buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(4), 1278–1294. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2019-0177

UNEP. (2023). United Nations Environment Programme Annual Report 2023 (pp. 1–24). United Nations Environment Programme 2023. https://www.unep.org/annualreport/2023

Waskitaningrum, N., & Avenzoar, A. (2024). PENERAPAN GREEN ARCHITECTURE TERHADAP PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA. DEARSIP: Journal of Architecture and Civil, 4(01), 95-103.

Þórólfsdóttir, E., Árnadóttir, Á., & Heinonen, J. (2023). Net zero emission buildings: A review of academic literature and national roadmaps. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 3(4), 042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad0e80

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Dharmatanna, S. W., Hintono, W., Wijaya, C., Adeline, A., & Christian, S. (2026). Comparasion of International and Indonesian Green Building Standards: Opportunities for Regulatory Harmonisation. DEARSIP : Journal of Architecture and Civil, 6(01), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.52166/dearsip.v6i01.11175