Cross-Cultural Perspectives of English Language Teaching: A Comparative Case Study of Junior High Schools in Indonesia and The Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v10i2.11773Keywords:
English Language Teaching, Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Curriculum Comparison, Indonesia, PhilippinesAbstract
English Language Teaching (ELT) in Southeast Asia is situated at the intersection of global communication demands, curriculum reform, and culturally embedded pedagogical practices. Differences in language status and educational environments shape how communicative curricula are enacted. This study examines how cultural orientations influence ELT implementation in two junior high schools: SMPN 1 Lamongan in Indonesia and SLSU Laboratory Junior High School in Tomas Oppus, Philippines. Using a qualitative comparative case study design, data were collected through document analysis, semi-structured interviews with four English teachers, and classroom observations involving 70 students. Thematic analysis was conducted using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, Byram’s intercultural communicative competence framework, and Tyler’s curriculum alignment model. Findings indicate that the interaction of language exposure, participation norms, and pedagogical structures shapes communicative practices. In the Indonesian classroom, communicative activities are implemented through teacher-guided scaffolding and collaborative tasks, reflecting hierarchical interaction patterns and limited English exposure. In contrast, the Philippine classroom demonstrates more sustained communicative interaction supported by extensive use of English and facilitative teaching practices. This study provides a context-sensitive account of how cultural orientations mediate communicative ELT practices and highlights the relationship between macro-cultural values and classroom-level pedagogy in Southeast Asia.
Downloads
References
Asyifa, F., Rodliyah, R. S., Amalia, L. L., & Mababaya, A. D. (2025). A comparative analysis of the Philippine and Indonesian English curricula at the elementary education level. International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application, 8(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v8i2.30813
Bernardo, A. S. (2022). Analysis of core claims, assumptions, and silences: A basis for redesigning the enacted K–12 English curriculum and reconceptualizing communicative competence. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1017
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Bray, M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. In M. Bray (Ed.), Comparative education: Continuing traditions, new challenges, and new paradigms (pp. 472–490). Pergamon.
Catahan, G. L., Mangulabnan, L. P., Visda, V. B. L., Perez, D. C., & Tolentino, J. C. G. (2025). Cross-cultural perspectives of Southeast Asian countries on physical education curriculum: A scoping review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.01.17
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Harida, E. S. (2025). Students’ meaning-making in multicultural interactions: A phenomenological study in international English classrooms. Journal of Multicultural Education Research, 1(5).
Hoff, H. E. (2020). The evolution of intercultural communicative competence: Conceptualisations, critiques, and consequences for 21st century classroom practice. Intercultural Communication Education, 3(2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v3n2.264
Irmayani, I., Hapsari, A. D., & Paradieshta, B. R. B. (2025). Strengthening classroom language to enhance English language exposure in class: Training results for non-native English teachers in Lamongan Regency. Global Sustainability and Community Engagement, 1(4), 321–327.
Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book review: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40–41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
Kirkpatrick, A. (2020). Englishes in the expanding circle: Focus on Asia. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 24(3), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-3-551-568
Kushnir, I. (2025). Thematic analysis in the area of education: A practical guide. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2471645
Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2022). Exploration of coding in qualitative data analysis: Grounded theory perspective. Research and Advances in Education, 1(6), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2022.12.07
Muhsinin, M., Chua, B. U., & Assapari, M. M. (2025). Balancing local and global perspectives: A comparative study of cultural content in Indonesian and Filipino high school English textbooks. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(2), 584–598.
Ni, K., & Shoimah, R. N. (2024). Analysis of teachers’ problems in the implementation of the independent curriculum. Journal of Educational Practice, 1(3), 201–210.
Nuha, M. U. (2025). Descriptive analysis of assessment practices in ELT: Teachers’ perspectives and challenges. Journal of Language Assessment, 9(1), 130–147.
Nurjihan, & Irmayani. (2025). Empowering student communication through oral presentation: A quasi-experimental study in EFL microteaching contexts. Journal of Research in English Language Teaching, 9(1), 62–77.
Park, S. M. (2025). Qualitative research methods in ethnic communities: A framework for studying language and cultural preservation. Journal of Sociolinguistic Studies, 12(3), 34–52.
Rahmawati, R., Ridwan, R., & Calambro, J. (2021). A comparative-case study of junior high school English curriculum between Indonesia and the Philippines. Proceedings of EAI Conference. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305231
Sitoy, J. S., Philip, R., & Sonsona, J. V. (2024). Investigating the use of communicative language teaching (CLT) strategies to promote innovative teaching and learning approaches. Journal of Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 393–402.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2023). Collective teacher culture and school goal structure: Associations with teacher self-efficacy and engagement. Social Psychology of Education, 26(4), 945–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09778-y
Sutarsih, C., Saud, U. S., & Herdiyanti, K. (2025). School principals’ instructional supervision strategies for enhancing teachers’ capacity for self-renewal. Educational Leadership Review, 9(2), 1336–1353.
Tupas, R., & Sercombe, P. (2014). Language, education and nation-building in Southeast Asia: An introduction. In R. Tupas (Ed.), Language, education and nation-building (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455536_1
Valenzona, R. B., Genuino, C. F., & Cruz, R. B. D. (2026). Filipino learners’ attitudes toward English language learning: Evidence from a reliability and validity study. Journal of Applied Linguistics Research.
Younas, A. (2025). Choosing an analytical approach in case study research. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535241306773
Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. (2010). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory. MindTools Newsletter, 2, 1–10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Belgis Raya Bian Paradieshta, Irmayani Irmayani, Syifa Khuriyatuz Zahro, Lillian Durango Balbon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
_(1).png)
